Bibliografia Cientometria - teste

1. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Pugini F. The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics. 2008;76(2):225-44.
2. Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C. Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity. Scientometrics. 2005;63:87-120.
3. Castera VT, Sanz-Valero J, Juan-Quilis V, Wanden-Berghe C, Culebras JM, Mateos A, et al. Bibliometric study of the journal nutricion hospitalaria for the period 2001-2005: Part 1, analysis of the scientific production. Nutricion Hospitalaria. 2008;23(5):469-76.
4. de Araujo AFP. Increasing discrepancy between absolute and effective indexes of research output in a Brazilian academic department. Scientometrics. 2008;74(3):425-37.
5. Delgado-Lopez-Cozar E, Jimenez-Contreras E, Ruiz-Perez R. Spain and the world's 25 top science countries in figures (1992-2008). Profesional De La Informacion. 2009;18(1):81-6.
6. Egghe L. The Influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008;59(8):1304-12.
7. Figueira I, Jacques R, Leta J. A comparison between domestic and international publications in Brazilian psychiatry. Scientometrics. 2003;56(3):317-27.
8. Huber JC, Wagner-Dobler R. Using the Mann-Whitney test on informetric data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2003;54(8):798-801.
9. Inonu E. The influence of cultural factors on scientific production. Scientometrics. 2003;56(1):137-46.
10. Jokic M. H-index as a new scientometric indicator. Biochemia Medica. 2009;19(1):5-9.
11. Kellner AWA, Ponciano L. H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences - comments and concerns. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias. 2008;80(4):771-81.
12. Krauskopf M. A scientometric radiography of Revista Medica de Chile. Revista Medica De Chile. 1997;125(7):775-80.
13. Kretschmer H. Similarities and dissimilarities in coauthorship networks: Gestalt theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of scientific literature. Library Trends. 2002;50(3):474-97.
14. Macias-Chapula CA. Toward a model of communications in public health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-Pan American Journal of Public Health. 2005;18(6):427-38.
15. Moin M, Mahmoudi M, Rezaei N. Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics. 2005;62(2):239-48.
16. Molinari JF, Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics. 2008;75(1):163-74.
17. Navarro A, Martin M. Scientific production and collaboration in Epidemiology and Public Health, 1997-2002. Scientometrics. 2008;76(2):291-313.
18. Novaes HMD. Scientific articles and scientific production in Public Health. Postscript. Cadernos De Saude Publica. 2007;23(12):3051-3.
19. Olmeda-Gomez C, Perianes-Rodriguez A, Ovalle-Perandones MA, Guerrero-Bote VP, Anegon FD. Visualization of scientific co-authorship in Spanish universities From regionalization to internationalization. Aslib Proceedings. 2009;61(1):83-100.
20. Prpic K. Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics. 2002;55(1):27-58.
21. Razzouk D, Gallo C, Olifson S, Zorzetto R, Fiestas F, Poletti G, et al. Challenges to reduce the '10/90 gap': mental health research in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2008;118(6):490-8.
22. Russell JM, del Rio JA, Cortes HD. Highly visible science: A look at three decades of research from Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and Spain. Interciencia. 2007;32:629-34.
23. Scimago G. Analysis of global scientific production by regions. Profesional De La Informacion. 2007;16(2):158-9.
24. Scimago G. Asia seen through the SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR). Profesional De La Informacion. 2008;17(6):677-8.
25. Zanotto ED. Scientific and technological development in Brazil. The widening gap. Scientometrics. 2002;55(3):411-9.